A1: Mixed Methods with MAXQDA: Practices and Techniques

Overview

This foundational course is a practical course designed to assist junior researchers in developing and executing a mixed method research (MMR) project. This course works extensively with examples, class exercises and workshopping student assignments, with extensive instructor feedback on optional written assignments. As such, the course is intended to guide students through the process of fitting an appropriately tailored MMR design to their research question, establish a plan to assess their empirical claims using a combination of research methods, and work out how to approach, collect and analyze different types of empirical data at multiple levels of analysis and across different spatial and temporal domains using MAXQDA.

Applications are closed

About the Course

This is a practical course designed to assist junior researchers in developing and executing a mixed method research (MMR) project. Mixed methods are increasingly deployed by researchers across social science disciplines. If designed correctly, mixed methods research can significantly strengthen the validity of one’s empirical findings, offset the weaknesses of single-method studies, and answer multiple questions in a single project. This course takes students from their central research question to the selection of the correct MMR template to techniques for data collection and analysis tailored to your project. Students should come prepared for class by reading short excerpts from three to four articles each day. During class sessions, we will discuss the principles of MMR from the readings and use class exercises to give students experience in how to use these principles in practice. Students will also gain hands-on familiarity with MAXQDA—a computer-aided qualitative data analysis software program used to organize and analyze multiple forms of data. (I can also offer guidance in NVivo, if that is your preferred platform.) To gain maximum benefit from the course, students are encouraged to bring their idea for a project for which they will develop a bespoke mixed methods research design. Over a period of five days, the instructor will assist each student in developing and writing up a plan for their MMR dissertation, book, or article project.

The best contemporary social science research is interdisciplinary. This implies not only working across epistemological and ontological lines, but also deploying multiple methodological approaches for analyzing and combining qualitative and quantitative data. The leading social science journals and book publishers increasingly feature two or more different social science methodologies, widely known as mixed method research (MMR). The value of drawing on more than one methodological approach is that many ”big” research questions can only be answered by examining processes taking place across multiple temporal and spatial domains at different levels of analysis. To understand these processes, today’s researchers increasingly draw on more than one methodology to shed light on multiple facets of social science questions in hopes of achieving both greater explanatory leverage and descriptively rich empirical results.  

The course is heavily weighted toward examples, class exercises and workshopping student assignments, with extensive instructor feedback on optional written assignments. As such, the course is intended to guide students through the process of fitting an appropriately tailored MMR design to their research question, establish a plan to assess their empirical claims using a combination of research methods, and work out how to approach, collect, and analyze different types of empirical data at multiple levels of analysis and across different spatial and temporal domains using MAXQDA.

Day 1

Covers the uses and attractiveness of mixed methods research by discussing best practices and first principles of MMR and by reviewing practical examples. We break down the logic of the MMR approach and discuss research questions that are particularly well-suited for MMR. The first day also covers the limitations and challenges students are likely to face in applying MMR to their own research projects, as well as common templates that researchers can adapt to their own use. The remainder of the course introduces students to MAXQDA and discusses how to use it to execute mixed methods research using class exercises.

Day 2

Covers traditional positivist MMR in mainstream social science. This typically combines regression analysis with small-N case analysis. On this day, we look at a range of ways that positivist researchers combine qualitative and quantitative data to answer their research questions. We discuss examples of these positivist projects with a focus on logico-deductive theory development, hypothesis testing, and concept definition and measurement. We also talk about how to sequence and blend different methods components differently depending on the researcher’s unique goals. This day is heavy weighted toward developing causal mechanisms, covering how to combine statistical analysis with small-N comparative studies, and how to combine micro-level experimental or other survey research undertaken at the individual level with macro-level analysis undertaken at higher levels of analysis.

Day 3

Focuses on how to combine different qualitative research techniques in positivist research designs. For example, some researchers use historical comparative analysis to examine a small set of cases comparatives over long periods of time. This can be done using comparative analysis of two to four cases using periodization analysis or critical juncture analysis. Another variety combines comparative or medium-N (QCA) analysis of multiple cases with a single in-depth case study analysis or comparative analysis using cross-temporal or –sectional analysis of states, institutions, groups, or individuals. The focus on Day 3 is how to combine cross-historical or comparative research using periodization strategies with single or paired case studies using pattern-matching and process-tracing techniques.

Day 4

Covers hybrid MMR projects that cross epistemological lines. These combine positivist and non-positivist techniques in an approach known as ”analytical eclecticism” or “critical realism.” While less mainstream than positivist hybrids (Days 2 and 3), the combination of interpretivist research techniques with positivist research design principles or positivist methods has gained momentum across a number of social science fields. As in the previous two days, class exercises will be conducted in MAXQDA to show how interpretivist data and analysis can be combined with more mainstream positivist data and analysis in a single project.

Day 5

Is meant to pull it all together, focusing on the data analysis, data displays, and the ”write-up,” namely how to derive empirical generalizations across different analyses and how to integrate these findings in a single, readable research report. On this day, we review methods for displaying findings visually in tables, charts, and figures, and show how to use MAXQDA to visualize data in new and exciting ways, using sample corpora provided by the instructor.

This description is subject to change at the discretion of the Instructor.

2 Credits

For completion of all work before and during the course, as outlined by the Instructor, and 90% participation and attendance of the course.

2 Additional Credits

Course specific extra assignments. These can include submitting assignments before the course, daily assignments, and/or a final assignment to be completed after the course as decided by the Instructor.

Instructor

Erin Jenne

jennee@ceu.edu

Erin K. Jenne (Stanford University, PhD) is a professor and chair at the International Relations Department at Central European University in Vienna, Austria, where she teaches MA and PhD courses on mixed qualitative and quantitative methods, ethnic conflict management, international relations theory, nationalism and populism, foreign policy analysis, and international security. Jenne received her PhD in political science with concentrations in comparative politics, international relations and organizational theory. She has received numerous grants and fellowships over her career, including a MacArthur fellowship at Stanford University, a Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA) fellowship at Harvard University, a Carnegie Corporation scholarship, a Senior Fernand Braudel fellowship at European University Institute (EUI) in Florence, and was co-principal investigator for a Minerva Grant from the US Office of Naval Research to conduct research on the subject of Chinese and Russian soft power. Her first book, Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment (Cornell University Press, 2007) is the winner of Mershon Center’s Edgar S. Furniss Book Award in 2007 and was also named a Choice Outstanding Academic Title by Choice Magazine. The book is based on her dissertation, which won the Seymour Martin Lipset Award for Best Comparativist Dissertation. Her second book, Nested Security: Lessons in Conflict Management from the League of Nations and the European Union (Cornell University Press, 2015) explores how emerging domestic struggles can be contained through soft power mediation. She is now publishing a third, co-authored book, entitled Clients, Rivals, and Rogues: Why Great Powers Intervene in Revolutionary Civil Wars (Cambridge University Press, 2025) that combines quantitative analysis of intervention data, textual analysis of UNSC debates, with intensive case studies of great power interventions in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and Ukraine. She has published numerous book chapters and articles in International Studies Quarterly, Security Studies, Regional and Federal Studies, Comparative European Politics, Studies in Comparative International Development, International Affairs, Europe-Asia Studies, East European Politics, Party Politics, Journal of Peace Research, Civil Wars, International Studies Review, Research and Politics, Journal of Democracy, Nations and Nationalism, Research & Politics, PS: Political Science & Politics, Nationalities Papers, and Ethnopolitics. She was an associate editor for the Journal of Foreign Policy Analysis and has served in several capacities on the Emigration, Ethnicity, Nationalism and Migration Section of the International Studies Association and the Comparative Politics Section of the American Political Science Association. She has taught courses on longitudinal case study analysis and mixed methods research at the ECPR Summer School and MethodsNET Summer School in Nijmegen, Netherlands and now Vienna Austria. She won the CEU Teaching Excellence Award in 2018 and the CEU Research Excellence Award in 2022.

Erinkristinjenne

Pricing

15% off During Early Bird!

  • Student Member

    €699.99
  • Student Non-Member

    €999.99
  • Other Member

    €849.99
  • Other Non-Member

    €999.99

Secure Your Place!

Please complete this webform for your registration.

Registration

Important Information

  1. Complete in English only 
  2. Do not complete in capital letters
  3. Course fees are reduced for MethodsNET members
  4. If you are not a MethodsNET Member at the time of completing this form you will pay the non-member fee
  5. If your institution or organization is paying for your course, complete the correct invoice information 
  6. Please note that your seat in a course is only reserved and guaranteed after you submit full payment of the registration fee.
Course Selection

You can select one Online + one All Day in each week or one Online + one AM & PM in each week

Address
Invoice Address (if different from above)

By submitting the form, you are agreeing with our Terms & Conditions, Code of conduct, and Privacy Policy.